Johns v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Mike Lynch (Lynch), Leo Woods (Woods) and Greg Johns (Johns) appeal from a judgment of the superior court dismissing their action for declaratory and injunctive relief on the ground that each plaintiff lacked standing. The superior court further held that the refusal of the Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission (CFEC) to grant a hearing to consider changing one of its regulations was not judicially reviewable. For the reasons stated hereafter, we reverse both decisions.
Appellants Lynch, Woods, and Johns have made their living seining…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- K & L DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. MurkowskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Alyeska Ski Corporation v. HoldsworthAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc. v. Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ruckle v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Johns v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. MeyerAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.