Legal Opinion

United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. v. Local Boundary Commission

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1971No. 1461PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

In this appeal we are asked to decide numerous questions generated by the role the Local Boundary Commission played in the annexation by the city of Nome of United States Smelting’s properties. We have determined that the superior court’s order dismissing United States Smelting’s action for declaratory judgment should be reversed with directions to enter a declaratory judgment decreeing the annexation in question to be invalid and of no effect.

Alaskan municipalities may gain territory in various ways. The city of Nome sought to do so through the Local Boundary Commission.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. K & L DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. MurkowskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Alyeska Ski Corporation v. HoldsworthAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Fairview Public Utility District No. One v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Rothkopf v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Oesau v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. LewisAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Totemoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Mukluk Freight Lines, Inc. v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API