Legal Opinion

Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural Resources

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1996No. S-6650PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We consider here whether Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. (UCM) owes back royalties to the State of Alaska under three state coal leases for coal mined between 1989 and March 1993. The Alaska Department of Natural Resources (DNR) ruled administratively that it does. On appeal by UCM, the superior court affirmed. We affirm the superior court’s decision.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

DNR claims back royalties, plus interest, of $346,550.35 due on three noncompetitive coal leases held by UCM. 1 DNR entered into the three leases in accordance with the provisions for coal…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. State, Department of Environmental ConservationAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. O'CALLAGHAN v. RueAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Alaska Center for the Environment v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API