Legal Opinion
Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc. v. Department of Health & Social Services
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1982No. 6156PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BURKE, C. J., RABINOWITZ, CONNOR and MATTHEWS, JJ., and SCHULZ, Judge. * RABINOWITZ, Justice.
This appeal involves a challenge to the validity of a decision made by the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services. 1 The Department determined that the Lake Otis Hospital project, for which a conditional certificate of need 2 had previously been issued, had been “substantially implemented.” As a consequence of this decision, the certificate of need will remain in effect indefinitely, until the project is completed or the certificate is revoked.
I. Background
From April 19, 1972 to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Amerada Hess Pipeline Corp. v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Rosen v. State Board of Public AccountancyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Shepherd v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. MeyerAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Kachemak Bay Watch, Inc. v. NoahAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.