Legal Opinion
State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. Meyer
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1995No. S-6036PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Andrea Meyer filed a discrimination complaint with the Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (Commission) against her employer, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF & G). We hold that the Commission’s order closing Andrea Meyer’s case is judicially reviewable. We further hold that Meyer’s claim of discrimination is supported by substantial evidence.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Andrea Meyer began working for ADF & G in 1977 as a seasonal field researcher for the Russian River Sockeye Salmon Fishery. Her job title was Fisheries Biologist I (FBI).…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Toliver v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Raad v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- In re J.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Peterson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.