Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bettis

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 5, 1986No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 27, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

A Petition for Disciplinary Action was filed against Bernard Bettis on February 8, 1985. Bettis was served with a summons, and with copies of the petition and discovery documents, but failed to respond. 1 Following entry of an order of default and the giving of notice thereof to the respondent, Judge Raymond G. Thieme conducted a hearing on October 2, 1985, at which respondent did not appear.

The findings of fact made by Judge Thieme, to which no exception was taken, show that Bettis is guilty of multiple violations of disciplinary rules arising out of his handling of two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. Balliet v. BALTO. CTY. BAR ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VelasquezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GittensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API