Legal Opinion
E. Brooke Matlack, Inc. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 31, 1954No. Civ. 15261PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARY, District Judge.
This action, to restrain the enforcement, operation and execution of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission was heard by a three-judge court convened under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2325, 28 U.S.C. § 2284, and 49 U.S.C.A. § 17(9). The order complained of denied in part the application of the plaintiff E. Brooke Matlack, Inc., hereinafter called “Matlack”, for a certificate of public convenience and necessity relating to the transportation of bulk liquids (except milk) and liquefied gas between Pennsylvania and New Jersey.. The application was originally heard…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967
- Port Terminal Railroad Association v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1973
- Youngblood Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1963
- Arrow Line, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.