Arrow Line, Inc. v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
The Arrow Line, Inc., of East Hartford, Connecticut, brought this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2325 to set aside or annul an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission which denied its application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity. See 49 U.S.C. §§ 305(g) and 17(9). Plaintiff applied for authority to operate a limousine service in interstate commerce, 49 U.S.C. § 307(a), and, after a hearing at which intervening defendants Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Providence Arrow Lines, Inc. were protestants, the hearing examiner recommended that a certificate…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- ICC v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Eastern-Central Motor Carriers Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1970
- Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. United States of America, the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Monsey Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- National Freight, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973