Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1398, 2284, 2321-2325, to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission fixing maximum rates and adjusting allegedly discriminatory rates charged by plaintiffs and other carriers for the shipment of new passenger automobiles. Joined as defendant with the United States is the Interstate Commerce Commission. Interveners are Chrysler Corporation, Hudson Motor Car Company, Packard Motor Car Company,' Nash-Kelvinator Corporation, Studebaker Corporation and WillysOverland Motors, Inc., all having been complainants…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chicago & E. I. R. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1952
- Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
- E. Brooke Matlack, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- Chamber of Commerce v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1967
- Legge v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.