Legal Opinion
Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 5, 1967No. Civ. A. 66-C-467PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ARRAJ, District Judge.
This action was instituted by fifteen motor carriers who seek to set aside, annul and enjoin a decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission, entered in “Increased Class & Commodity Rates, Transcontinental”, 326 I.C.C. 397 (1966). In that decision the Commission found that a three per cent rate increase in “transcontinental rates” which had been put into effect in 1964 by 1400 motor carriers had not been shown to be “just and reasonable”. The rate increase was therefore canceled by the Commission’s order dated April 15, 1966. A petition for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chicago & E. I. R. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1952
- New York Cent. R. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1951
- Accelerated Transport-Pony Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1964
- Davis & Randall, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Anderson, Leech & Morse, Inc. v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Port Terminal Railroad Association v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.