Legal Opinion

Welliver Welding Works v. Farmen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1995No. 92-01495, 92-01494; CA A79302PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that directed employer to provide vocational assistance. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. In 1986, claimant worked as a welder for approximately $425 per week. That same year, he compensably injured his back. Employer accepted his claim and closed it, with no award of permanent disability. Claimant was not entitled to vocational assistance at that time. Claimant returned to work as a welder with another employer.

Sometime around 1988, claimant quit his work as a welder, and became employed as an apartment manager at a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Bartz v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Linn-Benton-Lincoln Education Ass'n/OEA/NEA v. Linn-Benton-Lincoln ESDCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Petock v. AsanteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. LonerganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Chu v. SAIF Corp. (In re Chu)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Linn-Benton-Lincoln Education Ass'n/OEA/NEA v. Linn-Benton-Lincoln ESDCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API