Legal Opinion

State v. Lonergan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2006No. 20-03-00729; A121288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for escape in the second degree. ORS 162.155(l)(a). He assigns error to the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal (MJOA). As explained below, it is undisputed that, after escaping from the custody of an arresting officer, defendant used physical force to prevent recapture. He argues that that fact is insufficient, as a matter of law, to prove that he “use[d] physical force escaping from custody.” Id. We affirm.

The material facts are undisputed. Springfield Police Officer Donald Myers responded to a reported automobile theft in rural…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Carlson v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LonerganOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. LonerganOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. LonerganOregon Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API