Legal Opinion

Petock v. Asante

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 1, 2010No. 081041L7; A141216PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

This case involves the interplay between the “Unlawful Discrimination Against Injured Workers” statutes, ORS 659A.040 to 659A.052, and workers’ compensation law. The anti-discrimination statutes require an employer to reinstate or reemploy an injured worker who has recovered from a “compensable injury” if the worker applies within three years from the “date of injury.” ORS 659A.043(3)(a)(F) (reinstatement); ORS 659A.046(3)(f) (reemployment). Plaintiff was injured in an accident while working for defendant in 2002, and she was injured by a second accident in 2005, also while employed by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Century Home Components, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Day v. Advanced M & D Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Petock v. AsanteOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Anderson v. Hibu, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
  4. Petock v. AsanteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API