Petock v. Asante
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
This case involves the interplay between the “Unlawful Discrimination Against Injured Workers” statutes, ORS 659A.040 to 659A.052, and workers’ compensation law. The anti-discrimination statutes require an employer to reinstate or reemploy an injured worker who has recovered from a “compensable injury” if the worker applies within three years from the “date of injury.” ORS 659A.043(3)(a)(F) (reinstatement); ORS 659A.046(3)(f) (reemployment). Plaintiff was injured in an accident while working for defendant in 2002, and she was injured by a second accident in 2005, also while employed by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Century Home Components, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Day v. Advanced M & D Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kelley v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Petock v. AsanteOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Anderson v. Hibu, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Petock v. AsanteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010