Legal Opinion
Chu v. SAIF Corp. (In re Chu)
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 14, 2018No. A159901PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtEgan, C.J.
*196Claimant seeks review of an order of the director of the Department of Business and Consumer Services (the department) upholding SAIF's determination that she is not entitled to vocational assistance for her compensable work injury. The facts are not in dispute, and the only issue presented on judicial review is a question of statutory construction. We review the director's order for legal error, ORS 183.482(8), conclude that the director erred, and therefore reverse and remand.
In October 2010, claimant worked one day per week as a bartender/server at employer's restaurant, where she slipped…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- DeFazio v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Deluxe Cabinet Works v. MessmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McTigrit v. SAIF Corp. (In re McTigrit)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019