Legal Opinion · Dissent

Linn-Benton-Lincoln Education Ass'n/OEA/NEA v. Linn-Benton-Lincoln ESD

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 1999No. UC-22-96; CA A97730Published

1DissentLandau, P. J.

At issue in this case is whether the position of “interventionist” is “academically licensed” within the meaning of ORS 243.650(1) when the position requires no “license.” The Employment Relations Board (ERB) originally concluded that the position is not “academically licensed,” because it requires no “license” in the ordinary meaning of the term. On reconsideration, ERB changed its mind. In my view, ERB got it right the first time.

The majority disagrees. It begins with the assertion that the term “licensed” ordinarily means “a right or permission granted in accordance with law by a competent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API