Magee v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 31630 (T. D. 33263).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
It comprises articles of new rubber, such as balls, all of which are defective and unfit for ordinary use, scrap pieces of new rubber, rubber shoes which have not been worn but damaged in manufacture, and included in the importation it is said there is also scrap rubber, articles of various kinds, which have been in actual physical use, and as the result of such use have been worn out. As the record furnishes no basis for any segregation of the old and worn-out portions from those which are clippings from new material, the case should be treated as though the articles were all of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. Michelin Tire Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Cadwalader v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Koons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Stroheim v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- F. Lester Kittle, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
- United States Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.