Legal Opinion

Cheltenham Supply Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 27, 1969No. C.D. 3908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Re, Judge:

The plaintiff has brought this action to recover a portion of duties paid upon the importation of certain merchandise described on the invoice as “transparent cellulose film”. It was described in the Special Customs Invoice as “Cellophane in rolls substandard”, and was classified under the provisions of item 774.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as other “Articles, not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics”, dutiable at 17 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff’s primary claim is that the merchandise should have been classified as “Waste and scrap, of rubber or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Harley Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. SalomonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Schlesinger v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Koons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnebey-Cheney Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. C. T. Takahashi & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  3. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  4. Barnebey-Cheney Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API