Legal Opinion

United States v. Johns-Manville Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 18, 1914No. 1376; No. 1377PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7541 (T. D. 34276).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

These appeals concern importations at the port of New York of a variety of merchandise, which has been appropriately divided into three general classes:

1. Large pieces or sheets of the bark of the cork tree of inferior quality, either the first, or what is known as “virgin” bark, or later growths which are inferior in grain, and all of which are used to be ground into materials for cork carpets or linoleums and the manufacture of cork articles.

2. Small pieces or chunks of cork bark which have either been broken in handling through accident or have resulted from the trimming of sheets of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Ranlett & StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Seeberger v. CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United States v. Michelin Tire Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Salomon Bros. & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. United States v. StraussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Koons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. United States v. FuruyaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  3. Caracul Fur Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API