Legal Opinion
Pennington v. Bonelli
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1936No. Civ. 5600PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
By this petition for a writ of mandate petitioner seeks to compel respondent to issue to petitioner a renewal certificate of registration as an optometrist.
It appears that Charles R. Pennington became a duly registered optometrist in 1923, and as evidence of that fact there was issued to him by the state board of examiners in optometry a certificate of registration, and each year thereafter, upon the payment of the fee therefor, there has been issued to petitioner a renewal of said registration certificate.
In 1935 the optometry law (Stats, of 1913, chap. 598) was amended by chapter 604 of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Patrick v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Ellis v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- County of Los Angeles v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Smith v. Board of Dental ExaminersWashington Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ishimatsu v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Sellers v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Regents of University of California v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- California Ass'n of Dispensing Opticians v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Newmarker v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.