Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Smith v. Board of Dental Examiners
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1903No. 4202PublishedCited by 35 opinions
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Arthur E. Griffin, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hadley, J.
— The relator applied to the superior court for a writ of mandate directed to tire board of dental examiners of the state of Washington, and to respondents as members constituting said board. At the hearing the following stipulation was filed as embodying the essential facts involved:
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed that «I. W. Smith, the applicant herein, for five years last past, but no longer, has been, and at the time of the passage by the legislature-at its regular session of an act to amend sections 4, (5, 8 and 11 of chapter 55 of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Plumb v. ChristieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- State v. CareyWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Johnson v. Martin, Wise & FitzhughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- State v. YardleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Douglas v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Northern Cedar Co. v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- State ex rel. Richey v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Johnson v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1909
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.