Legal Opinion
Regents of University of California v. City of Santa Monica
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 12, 1978No. Civ. 50340PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON, J.
The City of Santa Monica, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as Santa Monica), appeals from a judgment determining that Santa Monica construction permit fee ordinances have no application to a work of construction undertaken by the Regents of the University of California, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as Regents), permanently enjoining Santa Monica from enforcing said ordinances as to Regents and awarding Regents as damages the refund of fees paid for permits plus interest.
Facts
The record discloses that under date of September 20, 1974, the Regents…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Goldberg v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIF.California Court of Appeal · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Campbell v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Kim v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- City of Lafayette v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.