Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Spencer

California Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1899No. L.A. No. 486PublishedCited by 35 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Walter Van Dyke, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

—The plaintiff appeals from a judgment following an order sustaining a demurrer to an amended complaint without leave to further amend.

The amended complaint purports td set out a cause of action to foreclose a lien for the expense of abating an insect pest nuisance in defendants’ orchard. This lien is claimed to exist by virtue of an act entitled, "An act to protect and promote the horticultural interest of the state,” and acts amendatory thereof and additional thereto. The act in question may be found in the Statutes of 1881, page 88, and the amendments and additions thereto in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Lamb v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Train v. Boston Disinfecting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. In re FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Suckow v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bowman v. Virginia State EntomologistSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API