Legal Opinion

Kirker v. Shell Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1951No. Civ. 17954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem.

The decision of this case turns primarily upon the question whether in a community oil lease, granted for a period of 20 years “and for so long thereafter as Lessee shall conduct drilling ... or producing operations on the leased land, or be excused therefrom, as hereinafter’ provided; . . . ,” a provision not a, part of the granting or habendum clauses, requiring the lessee to commence drilling operations prior to a date therein named, is a special limitation, which automatically ended the lease for a breach thereof or whether it is a covenant or condition subsequent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Stockburger v. DolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walter R. Beardslee v. Inflection Energy, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. San Mateo Community College District v. Half Moon Bay Limited PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. May v. ShieldsWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Lawatch v. LawatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API