Legal Opinion

May v. Shields

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1964No. 3205PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

The appellants as landowners seek to reverse a judgment of the district court under which their claim for ejectment in connec tion with certain mining property was denied. '

The landowners admit the giving of- a mineral lease to defendant-appellees for the production of marble. The primary term of the lease was five years. After about half of this term had run, the lessors served notice upon the lessees of default and termination of the lease. The notice gave the lessees 60 days within which to correct the asserted defaults. Following such 60 days the action in ejectment was commenced.

•The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Frierson v. International Agricultural Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  2. North American Uranium, Inc. v. JohnstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Larsen Sheep Co. v. SjogrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hoover v. General Crude Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Baker v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bentley v. PotterUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Beverly Plaza Associates v. Saul (In Re Kroh Bros. Development Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988
  3. Bouwkamp v. McNeillWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API