Legal Opinion

Rohrback v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 9, 1914No. Appeal, No. 298PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, No. 298, Jan. T., 1913, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No.- 3, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1909, No. 432, for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of Morris Rohrback v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Trespass for a personal injury. Before Davis, J. The jury found a verdict for plaintiff. Upon motion of defendant the court entered ’judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 298, Jan. T., 1913, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No.- 3, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1909, No. 432, for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of Morris Rohrback v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Trespass for a personal injury. Before Davis, J. The jury found a verdict for plaintiff. Upon motion of defendant the court entered ’judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned, among others, was in entering judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto. The case was for the jury: Kelly v. R. R. Co., 236 Pa.…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Stewabt,

The injury of which the plaintiff complains, and for which he seeks to recover damages from the defendant, was received at the hands of a Pullman porter. Plaintiff became a passenger for hire on one of the defendant company’s trains at Jersey City, his destination being Philadelphia. He purchased at the same time from the *134Pullman company the right to occupy a seat in one of its cars during the journey, with the incidental privileges. Soon after plaintiff had boarded the train, and before it had started, he became involved in a somewhat angry controversy with the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. ToomeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  2. Pittsburg, Allegheny & Manchester Passenger Railway Co. v. DonahueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  3. Allegheny Valley Railroad v. McLainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dincher v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. O'Brien v. Public Service Taxi Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  3. Finfrock v. Northern Central Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Cherillo v. SteinbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Riddell v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API