Dincher v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
Defendant appeals from judgment on a verdict for plaintiff in a suit to recover for serious knife wound injury inflicted on the plaintiff by Miles Balliet who was employed by defendant in its store at Milton, Pennsylvania. Plaintiff alleged that liability resulted from defendant’s failure to control Balliet in his relation with business visitors in the store.
Defendant denied knowledge of circumstances that would put it on notice and now complains of the refusal of its motion for judgment n. o. v. and of rulings on evidence. The question for our consideration is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McCrink v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Fletcher v. Baltimore & Potomac RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Commonwealth v. DeitrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Honaman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Dempsey v. Walso Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. CommanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Dolan v. Linton's LunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Wilson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Reichman v. WallachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.