Legal Opinion

Cherillo v. Steinberg

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1935No. Appeal, 222PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

On mature consideration of the pleadings and the evidence, we are of opinion that the averments in the plaintiff’s statement of claim, supported, as they are, by the evidence in the case, will not permit a recovery in this action, and that judgment non obstante veredicto should have been entered in favor of the defendants.

The action was brought by plaintiff against his former employers to recover the damages sustained by him as a result of a wilful and malicious assault upon him by his ‘boss’, or supervisor,—another of defendant’s employees—, because of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brennan v. Merchant & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. McClung v. DearborneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Petrowski v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Pilipovich v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Berryman v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Public Service Taxi Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. M'phail v. Pktn's Nt. Det. Agy, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. MacPhail v. Pinkerton's National Detective Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. O'Brien v. Public Service Taxi Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Dalsey v. Czeiner Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API