Legal Opinion

Whipple v. Cain

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1920No. 10,360PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Fayette Circuit Court; George W. Pigman, Special Judge. Action by Frank Cain against William C. Whipple. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, C. J.

This was an action by appellee against appellant to recover on account of damages to *286appellee’s automobile and to his person occasioned by collision between appellee’s and appellant’s cars.

The only errors that are properly assigned are: First, the overruling of appellant’s motion for judgment in his favor upon the jury’s answers to interrogatories, notwithstanding the general verdict; and, second, in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.

1. The first error is waived for the reason that appellant has not set out the complaint, nor stated the substance thereof, in his brief. Appellant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Solimeto v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Moore v. OhlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Talbot v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Miller v. Berne Hardware Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Robbins v. Bank of Starke CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fishel v. PinckardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Pfeil v. Citizens Loan & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Allen v. AllenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API