Legal Opinion

Fishel v. Pinckard

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1923No. 11,400PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Complaint by appellee against Charles I. Fishel, and Herbert W. Fishel, alleging'that they were partners and as such were in the business of boarding, handling and training dogs under the name of Herbert W. Fishel; that they maintained kennels at Hope, Indiana, in carrying on their business; that Charles had charge of and managed said kennels; that Herbert was known as the head handler and had charge of the training of the dogs in the field and went from place to place for that purpose and to procure dogs to *546place in the kennels in charge of Charles; that appellee, who resided in the State of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. WoolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago R. W. Co. v. TreadwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Dickensheets v. KaufmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Moore v. OhlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Tomlinson v. CollettIndiana Supreme Court · 1834

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Optical Co. v. WeidenhamerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Standard Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Arrow Petroleum Co. v. AMESIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Thomson v. CornIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Doerr, Admr. v. Hibben, Hollweg Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API