Legal Opinion

Miller v. Berne Hardware Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1917No. 9,282PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Adams Circuit Court; David E. Smith, Judge. Action by the Berne Hardware Company against Mathias Miller. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in appellee’s favor for $323 in an action brought by it to recover on a promissory note. It is not necessary to a disposition of the questions presented by the appeal to further indicate the issues upon which the case was tried. The errors relied on for reversal are: (1) The *475overruling of the demurrer to the complaint; (2) the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (3) the overruling of the motion for new trial.

1. 2. 3. The only objection to the complaint suggested in this court is that (we quote from appellant’s brief) it…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Stanley v. SutherlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Long v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Stiles v. HaslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. BeissenherzIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State ex rel. Salt Creek Civil Township v. StevensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. State ex rel. Fenstermacher v. McNelisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Reyman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Whipple v. CainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API