Moore v. Ohl
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Clinton Circuit Court; Joseph Combs, Judge. Action by Sarah C. Ohl against Laurinda Moore. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.
Appellee filed in the Clinton Circuit Court a complaint in two paragraphs. The first paragraph was based on a promissory note for $700, executed by appellant on May 9, 1902, due five years after date, and bearing five per cent, interest from date. The second paragraph was based on a note for $500, executed May 23, 1899, due one year after date, and bearing six per cent, interest from date, with a credit of $10 endorsed thereon, of ríate June 23, 1900, “to be applied on interest,” such paragraph containing an averment that a payment of five dollars was made on said note December 26, 1913.
The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Chicago & Erie Railroad v. DiniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Inland Steel Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Higham v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Porter v. RosemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Indianapolis Railways, Inc. v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Commercial Union Assurance Co. of London v. SchumacherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Kavanaugh v. EnglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Gray v. BlankenbakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.