Solimeto v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Monroe Circuit Court; Robert W. Miers, Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Vito Solimeto. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
— Appellant was convicted on an affidavit filed in the lower court for a violation of what is commonly known as the “Blind Tiger” Law. Errors set out in his brief are: (1) The court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to quash the affidavit. (2) The court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a continuance. (3) The court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.
1. Appellant does not set out in his brief a copy of the affidavit, a copy of his motion to quash, a copy of his motion for a continuance, or a copy of his motion for a new trial. Section 5 of Rule 22 requires…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Heier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by22 opinions
- Matter of Tina T.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Kostas v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Blood v. Gibson Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. MonfortIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Gray v. McLaughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.