Legal Opinion
Offer v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1924No. S. F. No. 11020PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
This is an application for a writ of prohibition made by the attorney for and on behalf of the petitioner, the party beneficially interested, to restrain the superior court, in and for the city and county of San Francisco, and Honorable George H. Cabaniss, judge thereof, from proceeding to trial of an action for an amount less than $300, upon the grounds that the superior court has no jurisdiction in the premises and that the petitioner has no plain, speedy, or adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. An order to show cause was ordered to issue.
It appears that the Maryland Casualty…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Great Lakes Engineering Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Powell v. . Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Dunlop v. . JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Dibble v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Meyers v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Patent Scaffolding Co. v. William Simpson Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.