Legal Opinion
Application of Marriott-Hot Shoppes, Inc. (Now by Change of Name, Marriott Corporation)
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 19, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8354PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Dismiss Appeal
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is before us on the Patent Office motion to dismiss under our Rule 12 on the ground that we lack jurisdiction to determine any issue raised by the reasons of appeal. The Patent Office Solicitor has filed an extensive brief, appellant has replied in opposition to the motion, and the solicitor has filed a reply brief. There has been no oral hearing.
Appellant’s sole objective on this appeal apparently is to change the practice in ex parte trademark appeals within the Patent Office to require that they be heard either by the entire Trademark…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Application of Rudolf WiechertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- United States Treasury v. Synthetic Plastics Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- John E. Lindberg, Jr. v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Seamless Rubber Co. v. Ethicon, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Bose CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Application of Leo L. HengeholdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of John Edward JamesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- In Re Holland American Wafer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In re GaertnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.