Legal Opinion
Application of Leo L. Hengehold
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 29, 1971No. Patent Appeal 8345PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claim 17 1 as unpatentable in view of a patent to Haxton, 2 and refusing to review a requirement for restriction made by the examiner under 35 U.S.C. § 121.
The Invention
The invention relates to a feed turret and speed reduction gear train. Appellant’s feed turret arrangement includes a driving gear, a plurality of compound gears each having a large and small gear in axially spaced relationship and idler gears disposed on individual shafts between a pair of end plates,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Steinmetz v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- In re AllattCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- Application of Marriott-Hot Shoppes, Inc. (Now by Change of Name, Marriott Corporation)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Scott Searles, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- John E. Lindberg, Jr. v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Digital Equipment Corporation v. Sidney A. Diamond, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Palisades Pageants, Inc. v. Miss America PageantCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In re HaasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Biogen Ma, Inc. v. Japanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- In Re Kenneth L. BergerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.