Seamless Rubber Co. v. Ethicon, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal raises the question as to the meaning and effect of Sec. 21 of the TradeMark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1071, providing, inter alia, for appeals to this court. This is a trademark opposition instituted by appellee which was dismissed January 31, 1958, by the Examiner of Trade-Mark Interferences upon appellant’s (applicant’s) motion. From this dismissal, appellee-opposer appealed to the Commissioner of Patents on January 15, 1959. Assistant Commissioner Leeds reversed the decision of the Examiner of Interferences and ordered the case to proceed to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Master, Wardens, Searchers, Assistants and Commonalty of the Co. Of Cutlers in Hallamshire in County of York v. Sheffield Steel CorpCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- Knickerbocker Toy Co. v. Faultless Starch Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Toro Co. v. Hardigg Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- United States Treasury v. Synthetic Plastics Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Goodbar v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Application of Marriott-Hot Shoppes, Inc. (Now by Change of Name, Marriott Corporation)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.