Legal Opinion
In re Gaertner
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided August 2, 1979No. Appeal No. 79-528PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
The Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirmed the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 185 of application No. 599,574 filed July 28, 1975, and entitled “Oxazolidinone Phosphonates.” We affirm.
Background
On June 17, 1974, Gaertner filed application No. 479,932 (parent) directed to a class of herbicidal compounds having the formula:
wherein R and R1 are each selected from alkyl of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, alkenyl of 3 to 4 carbon atoms, and the mono-chloroderivatives of such alkyl and alkenyl. As disclosed in the application, the compounds are generally prepared…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Beckman Instruments, Inc. And Harold A. Frediani v. Coleman Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Application of Marriott-Hot Shoppes, Inc. (Now by Change of Name, Marriott Corporation)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Blake v. Bassick CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
- Union Carbide Corporation v. Microtron CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Transitron Electronic Corporation v. Hughes Aircraft Company, Transitron Electronic Corporation v. Hughes Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
- Twin Disc, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- KNAUF INSULATION, LLC v. JOHNS MANVILLE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024