Legal Opinion

Application of John Edward James

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 22, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8268PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

James appeals from the action taken by the Patent Office Board of Appeals dismissing his appeal to that tribunal for failure to file a reply brief. For reasons stated herein, we have decided that this court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the controversy and therefore dismiss this appeal.

The facts are as follows:

Certain claims 1 in appellant’s application2 were given a final rejection as “unpatentable over Montgomery, et al. in view of Berger, et al.”

Appellant appealed the Final Rejection and submitted a brief to the Board of Appeals wherein he listed all…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Treasury v. Synthetic Plastics Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. Application of Marriott-Hot Shoppes, Inc. (Now by Change of Name, Marriott Corporation)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. Application of Scott Searles, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  4. Sundback v. BlairCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Digital Equipment Corporation v. Sidney A. Diamond, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  2. Palisades Pageants, Inc. v. Miss America PageantCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. In re HaasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  4. In re DollingerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  5. In re LoehrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API