Legal Opinion
Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 11, 1983No. 194-83CPublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge.
This is an action to enjoin the award of a subcontract by Hawaiian Dredging and Construction Company, a government contractor. Plaintiff claims that the award, nominally to be made by the contractor, is in fact controlled by the United States, through its Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAYFAC) which had awarded the principal contract to Hawaiian Dredging.
*374The United States admits to participation in the bidding process. The price of the subcontract, which calls for production of certain air compressors to be used by Hawaiian Dredging, is to be passed on to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Heyer Products Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Quality Furniture Rentals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Indian Wells Valley Metal Trades Council v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Southfork Systems, Inc. v. The United States, and State of Texas, Acting Through the Texas Commission for the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- CACI Field Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- United International Investigative Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.