Legal Opinion
Van Tiger v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1936No. L. A. 15832PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The order for a transfer of this cause after an opinion was filed in the District Court of Appeal was made mainly for the reason that said court as constituted at the time of the rendition of said opinion consisted of only one duly elected and qualified member thereof and two justices pro tempore. There is a serious question as to whether a court as thus constituted is a *380legally constituted court. This question, however, became moot upon the order of transfer being made.
We have examined the opinion filed in the District Court of Appeal and prepared by Mr. Presiding Justice Grail,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Traffic Truck Sales Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- De Leonis v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Osmont v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by16 opinions
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Kinsell v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Jablon v. HennebergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Felton Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Ace Automotive Products, Inc. v. Van DuyneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.