Legal Opinion

De Leonis v. Walsh

California Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1903No. L.A. No. 1274PublishedCited by 31 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff against Laurent Etchepare to recover certain money alleged to have been received by him as her agent and to obtain a decree requiring him to reconvey to her certain real property alleged to have been conveyed by her to said Etchepare, upon his false representations that she was indebted to him for money advanced, and for the purpose of securing the repayment of the same.

Plaintiff obtained judgment decreeing a reconveyance, upon the payment by her to defendant of the sum of $2,444.09, with interest from July 27, 1899, and defendant appeals from said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Kreamer v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Wassermann v. SlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Lynch v. BenciniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Green v. FrahmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Osmont v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Tognazzi v. WilhelmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API