Kinsell v. Bank of America
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
The basic problem for decision is whether certain assignments of interests in a testamentary trust were effective, thus decreasing or defeating the interests of .the appellants. The trial court held such assignments effective. We disagree; the assignors merely possessed contingent remainders ; on the nonoceurrenee of the condition the assignee possessed nothing.
The following genealogical chart* will be helpful in understanding the problem involved.
Eleanor Haney died January 19, 1913. Her will was admitted to probate February 11, 1913. Paragraph 10 provided :
“All the rest, residue and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of BuechnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Callnon v. WinrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Estate of HaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Estate of MinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Borgonovo v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Estate of J. S. Ferry v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.