Legal Opinion

Beverly Hills Oil Co. v. Beverly Hills Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 1968No. Civ. 24238PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, P. J.

The question in this case is whether the trial court’s interpretation of an oil and gas lease, whereby the judge decided, after admitting extrinsic evidence, that the ■word “rentals”- does :not mean “royalties” but refers' to “delayed rentals” or payments for deferring of drilling, may be sustained.

General Facts

On June 2, 1959, the Beverly Hills Unified School District leased to Allen Guiberson about 22 acres of land which were largely occupied on the surface by facilities of a high school. The lease was for the exploitation of oil and gas. The allowable drillsite was but 0.459 acres.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Tanner v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Crestview Cemetery Ass'n v. DiedenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barroso v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Powers v. Dickson, Carlson & CampilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Southern Counties Gas Co. v. Ventura Pipeline Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Chavez v. Zapata Ocean Resources, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Corona Summit v. SPUS05 Corona Summit CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API