Legal Opinion
Doe v. Beard
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 18, 2014No. Case No. EDCV 13-02262 DDP (Spx)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE MOTION TO DISMISS
DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court adopts the following order and denies the motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff was a prisoner at California Institute for Men (“CIM”), which is administered by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). He was and is HIV-positive. In 2012, Defendant Young (a medical technician at the prison) misplaced his medical file, which…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Franceschi v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Doe v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Dean v. ZhangDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Doe v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Guy v. Convergent Outsourcing IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.