Guy v. Convergent Outsourcing Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 LEO GUY, et al., CASE NO. C22-1558 MJP 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 12 v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 13 CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC., 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.’s Motion 18 to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 36.) Having reviewed the Motion, the Response (Dkt. No. 43), the Reply 19 (Dkt. No. 44), and all supporting materials, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the 20 Motion to Dismiss. 21 BACKGROUND 22…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.