Legal Opinion

Doe v. Regents of the University of California

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 8, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00598Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JANE DOE, Case No. 23-cv-00598-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 10 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Re: Dkt. No. 3 11 Defendant. 12 13 INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Jane Doe alleges that the Regents of the University of California (“UC Regents”) 15 violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), Confidentiality of Medical Information 16 Act (“CIMA”), and right to privacy under the California Constitution and the common law, 17 breached an express or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API