Legal Opinion

In Re the Disbarment & Request to Resign of Hetland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1978No. 48266PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to Rule 12, Rules of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, the Administrative Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (Board) petitioned this court, on October 19, 1977, to take disciplinary action against respondent, Edwin Aron Hetland. On that same date, as an interim measure, the Board petitioned the court, per Rule 16, to immediately suspend respondent from the practice of law. On October 26, 1977, an en banc hearing was held before this court regarding the Board’s petition for immediate suspension; respondent appeared pro se. At the conclusion of the hearing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Application for Discipline of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Application of Smith for Reinstatement as AttorneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. State Ex Rel. La Jesse v. MeisingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. In Re Application for Discipline of StreaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. In re the Disbarment of HetlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Matter of Discipline of JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Matter of Discipline of PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API