Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Glassing

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1994No. 93-634PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

Defendant Gary Glassing (Glassing) appeals an order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, denying his motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul). We reverse.

While Glassing raises three issues on appeal, we shall only address one issue, as it is dispositive of the case:

Is St. Paul’s action barred by the statute of limitations?

This case was previously before us in St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1993), 257 Mont. 47, 847 P.2d 705 (St. Paul I), which set forth the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. FalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Skauge v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Youngblood v. American States InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Dominici v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1964
  5. In Re the Estate of LangendorfMontana Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Nimmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Royal Insurance v. RoadarmelMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. MOTOR CLUD INS. ASS'N v. FillmanNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. ReckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API