Legal Opinion

Youngblood v. American States Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1993No. 93-225PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

Plaintiffs Alfred Youngblood (Alfred) and Mary Ann Youngblood (Mary Ann) appeal an order of the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, denying their motion for summary judgment and granting Defendant’s (American States) motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

The issues on appeal are as follows:

1. Is the choice oflawprovision in Alfred’s insurance policy, which allows American States to subrogate pursuant to Oregon law, enforceable?

2. Does the subrogation clause at issue violate Montana’s public policy?

American States issued an automobile liability insurance policy to Alfred…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Skauge v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wellcome v. Home InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Kemp v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. McCracken v. City of ChinookMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Bower v. TebbsMontana Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Modroo v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Casarotto v. LombardiMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Swanson v. Hartford Ins. Co. of MidwestMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Augustine v. SimonsonMontana Supreme Court · 1997

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API