Legal Opinion

Royal Insurance v. Roadarmel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2000No. 99-552PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

¶1 The Royal Insurance Company (“Royal”) initiated this subrogation action against Earl W. Roadarmel (“Roadarmel”), who had been injured in a workers’ compensation accident in 1986, and the attorney who prosecuted his claim, Donald E. White (‘White”). The Workers’ Compensation Court, State of Montana (“the WCC”), granted summary judgment to Royal under the subrogation statute *510of the Workers’ Compensation Act, § 39-71-414, MCA (1985), finding Roadarmel and White (collectively “Appellants”) personally liable for Royal’s share of third-party proceeds received as a result of litigation against…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Shea v. North-Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Skauge v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rideaux v. TorgrimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Thiel v. TAURUS DRILLING LTD. 1980-IIMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Heisler v. Hines Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Osterman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Polar Bear Productions, Inc. v. Timex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Haux v. Montana Rail Link, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Lehman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Johnson Farms, Inc. v. HallandMontana Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API